Expert e-wire
  Sign me up!  
  Have your say!  

Not logged in
  Log in now  

Join up!
Benefits for experts
Application form
Apply online

Benefits for lawyers

Did we help?
  Feedback   
  Tell a friend   
  Contact us...   

Professional Indemnity Insurance for Expert Witnesses
Top quality
PI Insurance cover
at market-beating prices

Little Books
The Little Books
We have learnt the lessons from the mistakes of others, now you can learn them too!

Expert Witness
Year Book
The Expert Witness Year Book
Slip one in your bag, and you can be the expert with the facts at your fingertips!
  Expert evidence in criminal proceedings

The Law Commission publishes its recommendation on expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales

The final recommendations from the Law Commission, together with a draft Criminal Evidence (Experts) Bill, are set out in the report published on 22 March 2011, Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales (Law Com No 325). In the report, the Law Commission formally recommends that there should be a new reliability-based admissibility test for expert evidence in criminal proceedings. The test would not need to be applied routinely or unnecessarily, but it would be applied in appropriate cases and it would result in the exclusion of unreliable expert opinion evidence. Under the test, expert opinion evidence would not be admitted unless it was adjudged to be sufficiently reliable to go before a jury. It is the belief of the Law Commission that this means juries would be less likely to reach their conclusions on unreliable evidence and there would be fewer miscarriages of justice, which would result in greater public confidence in the criminal justice system.

This has been an important piece of work that the Law Commission has, characteristically, taken time and trouble over to try and arrive at final recommendations that are clear in purpose and likely to achieve the desired results in practice. The Law Commission consulted widely during the project and was seen to be responsive to the concerns raised by those who engaged in the process. The outcome of all this care and attention is a set of recommendations that has broad support amongst judges, lawyers and expert witnesses. We will, however, have to be a bit more patient yet. If you thought it took the Law Commission a long time to get its report out, just wait to see how long it takes the politicians to get round to implementing the recommendations!

 

Valued this article? or

 

 

 
Issue 67
March 2011

Expert evidence in criminal proceedings
Who is responsible for delay?
First Cambridge Annual Medico-Legal Conference


Current issue
November 2017

A witness summons too far
Handling a potential conflict of interest
Joint and several liability
Conference news
Not logged in -  Log in now