Expert e-wire
  Sign me up!  
  Have your say!  

Not logged in
  Log in now  

Join up!
Benefits for experts
Application form
Apply online

Benefits for lawyers

Did we help?
  Tell a friend   
  Contact us...   

Professional Indemnity Insurance for Expert Witnesses
Top quality
PI Insurance cover
at market-beating prices

Little Books
The Little Books
We have learnt the lessons from the mistakes of others, now you can learn them too!

Expert Witness
Year Book
The Expert Witness Year Book
Slip one in your bag, and you can be the expert with the facts at your fingertips!
  Scoping reports

What are ‘Limited Screening Reports’ and should experts have any truck with them?

A call to the UK Register of Expert Witnesses helpline raised a question about a ‘Limited Screening Report’ (LSR) that had subsequently been served in litigation. An LSR is a report written very early in a case, well before court proceedings have been issued, and based on limited information. Its purpose is to help a solicitor gain an early indication of the expert issues.

We have long been advocates of these sorts of ‘scoping report’ because, being undertaken very early in the process, they ought to be able to better focus the use of expert evidence should a case proceed.

If you do write one, though, it is important to understand that you are being instructed as an expert advisor rather than an expert witness. As such, you do not owe an overriding duty to the court because you are not instructed under Part 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR). You are simply a paid advisor to the party. You could, therefore, expect to be giving the party professional advice on how best to present the case – something an expert witness should never do. For this reason, it can sometimes be difficult to make the transition from expert advisor to expert witness should the claim move forward.

Any report prepared as an expert advisor should be clearly marked as ‘not for the court’ so that it cannot be deployed in litigation. Of course, the party can still use it as a bargaining chip in its negotiations.

However, any attempt to drag the expert into CPR-compliant work (e.g. answering questions) on the basis of the scoping report must be resisted. The move from expert advisor to expert witness proper (i.e. one instructed under CPR 35) must be carefully considered and formally agreed. It is inevitable, in my view, that such a move will involve the writing of a second, CPRcompliant report.

It is gratifying to see that in the new civil guidance (see the contrasting roles of expert advisor and expert witness are given due prominence.



Issue 87
May 2015

Scoping reports
Changes to CPR
New criminal practice direction

Current issue
June 2018

Is your spare room filling up?
Document retention policy
What is a reasonable time for document retention?
Conference news
Not logged in -  Log in now