Members should Log in now to gain full access to the library material

Not logged in
  Log in now  

Join up!
Benefits for experts
Application form
Apply online

Benefits for lawyers

Did we help?
  Feedback   
  Tell a friend   
  Contact us...   

Professional Indemnity Insurance for Expert Witnesses
Top quality
PI Insurance cover
at market-beating prices

Little Books
The Little Books
We have learnt the lessons from the mistakes of others, now you can learn them too!

Expert Witness
Year Book
The Expert Witness Year Book
Slip one in your bag, and you can be the expert with the facts at your fingertips!
 

Index to published articles

Here we provide ready access to a variety of published articles written by us. These deal with topics of interest to expert witnesses.

New Law Journal

2014

  • A matter of opinion. 24 January 2014 Is expert opinion produced outside the court process admissible?
  • Game Over. 4 July 2014 Are experts now able to tackle the ultimate issue?
  • A foreign affair. 19 September 2014 Chris Pamplin looks at some of the expert witness issues that can arise in litigation that crosses EU member state borders.
  • Backlash on whiplash. 19 November 2014 Chris Pamplin looks at recent moves by the Ministry of Justice to control the whiplash claims industry & MROs

2013

  • Switching Experts. 21 June 2013 Chris Pamplin considers what can be done when the expert’s opinion changes.
  • The best fit. 19 April 2013 Chris Pamplin considers how easy it is to choose the right expert.
  • Balance of Power. 27 September 2013 Chris Pamplin looks at whether the court can override an expert determination decision.
  • Expert Analysis 18 October 2014 Dr Chris Pamplin shares the top line results of the 2013 UK Register of Expert Witnesses survey

2012

  • Cause & effect. 23 November 2012 Chris Pamplin looks back at clinical negligence case law and finds a relaxation in the burden of proof.
  • Getting in line. 28 September 2012 Chris Pamplin considers revised guidance for expert witnesses & those who instruct them.
  • The heat is on. 20 July 2012 Chris Pamplin reports on some initial findings about expert evidence given concurrently from the "hot tub"
  • No wizards or wands. 29 June 2012 Chris Pamplin & Bernard Kat clarify the meaning of the term "psychologist"
  • Relative values. 27 April 2012 Dr Chris Pamplin takes a hard look at the expert witness-specific recommendations from the Family Justice Review
  • Full disclosure? 27 January 2012 Chris Pamplin debates the disclosability of pre-action expert reports

2011

  • In confidence? 25 November 2011 Chris Pamplin looks at the extent to which an expert witness’s evidence might be affected by earlier exposure to information
  • Expert analysis. 4 November 2011 Chris Pamplin highlights changes & contrasts in the expert witness market
  • Supreme Court experts? 8 April 2011 Chris Pamplin reflects on the decision in Jones v Kaney & predicts some unintended consequences

2010

  • Time to jump? 24 September 2010 Is the end in sight for expert witness immunity? Dr Chris Pamplin considers the evidence
  • What’s the crack? 18 August 2010 Chris Pamplin analyses a case of cracking brinkmanship
  • Getting into hot water. 29 January 2010 The one thing the hot tub is unlikely to do is save much money
  • Approach with care. 29 January 2010 Dr Chris Pamplin explains how to save money without damaging the supply of expert witnesses

2007

  • Cross-examining the experts. 26 October 2007 Chris Pamplin analyses the results of a major survey of the expert witness marketplace
  • Limiting the evidence. 26 October 2007 What is the expert’s role in gathering and presenting evidence? Chris Pamplin reports.

2005

  • Bearing false witness: the regulatory effect. 18 November 2005 Chris Pamplin shines the spotlight on ‘false’ expert evidence cases, but finds that proposed changes to the regulation of expert witnesses may still leave the courts fumbling in the dark with scientific opinion
  • Don’t shoot the messenger. 25 February 2005 Chris Pamplin reviews the LSC proposals on the use of experts in publicly funded cases and argues that, if implemented, they would add to the ongoing erosion of access to justice for the most vulnerable in society
Disclaimer
The information contained herein is supplied for general information purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Neither J S Publications nor the authors accept responsibility for any loss that may arise from reliance on information contained herein. You should always consult a suitably qualified adviser on any specific problem or matter.

J S Publications... giving you so much more
 
Much of this library is available exclusively to registered experts

Getting registered
Not logged in -  Log in now