Expert e-wire
  Sign me up!  
  Have your say!  

Not logged in
  Log in now  

Join up!
Benefits for experts
Application form
Apply online

Benefits for lawyers

Did we help?
  Tell a friend   
  Contact us...   

Professional Indemnity Insurance for Expert Witnesses
Top quality
PI Insurance cover
at market-beating prices

Little Books
The Little Books
We have learnt the lessons from the mistakes of others, now you can learn them too!

Expert Witness
Year Book
The Expert Witness Year Book
Slip one in your bag, and you can be the expert with the facts at your fingertips!
  Paying LiP service to justice

The Lord Chief Justice confirms that the Legal Aid cuts have significantly increased the number of LiPs in court.

In Issue 77 (May 2013) we considered the likely consequence of further cuts to the civil legal aid budget: there will be growing numbers of cases involving litigants in person (LiPs). We now have the Lord Chief Justice, when giving evidence to MPs, confirming that the cuts have ‘undoubtedly’ caused a significant increase in the number of LiPs in court.

Appearing before the Commons Justice Select Committee in April 2014, Sir John Thomas said that the number of people representing themselves in family courts has risen in the past year. Pressed by MPs on the effects of the legal aid cuts, Sir John conceded that there is now more pressure on the court system.

There is no doubt that [the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act] is having an effect on the bottom rung of civil work... The issue is particularly acute in family cases. If two people who have had a breakdown in their relationship are required to be adversarial parties, our system does not work very well. Most district judges are moving to swearing the parties in and conducting the case in a more inquisitorial manner.

He added:

All my colleagues who do cases with litigants in person say it significantly added to the time [the case takes]. The saving you get by not having lawyers has to be counter-balanced by the increase you have to have in court time.

Meanwhile, NAPO (a trade union and professional association whose members work in probation and family courts) has reported family court figures showing that before the legal aid cuts came in (April 2013), 18% of cases began with neither party represented and 82% of cases began with one or both parties having legal representation. By December 2013, the position was that only 4% of cases had both parties represented and in 42% of cases both parties were LiPs.



Issue 85
February 2015

Consequences of choosing the wrong expert
What’s relevant?
Paying LiP service to justice

Current issue
June 2018

Is your spare room filling up?
Document retention policy
What is a reasonable time for document retention?
Conference news
Not logged in -  Log in now